• To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Subject: RE: Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: the web client interface was RE: Two link questions)
• From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 12:28:03 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: "'veillard@r...'" <veillard@r...>, "xml-dev@l..." <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE022DC637@h...>

> Because the risk is possible, not having
> covered it means the business model (not the software product)
> is not credible.

"not credible" is way too strong; perhaps "less credible"
	/r$

• References:
  • RE: Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: the web client interface was RE: Two link questions)
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: the web client interface was RE: Two link questions)
• Next by Date: RE: the web client interface was RE: Two link questions
• Previous by thread: RE: Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: the web client interface was RE: Two link questions)
• Next by thread: RE: Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: the web client interface was RE: Two link questions)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread