• To: "'ari@c...'" <ari@c...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: the web client interface was RE: Two link questions)
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 11:02:48 -0500

One where indemnification clauses are standard business 
contract items and in which assuming that risk for 
open source could make it more expensive than other 
options.  Risk management is essential to credible 
competition because one does this on behalf of the 
customer.  The contract is made by liquidation 
obligations.  If the open source community does 
not assume those obligations, they are not credible. 

This isn't a technology sand pile.

len


From: ari@c... [mailto:ari@c...]

"Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...> writes:

> intended, but that is how open source can become a credible 
> competitor. 

Following Dare's lead, I'll ask Len what world he lives in. "Can
become"? Time to get your head out of the sand.

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: the web client interface was RE: Two link questions)
    • From: Jay Vaughan <jv@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: the web client interface was RE: Two link questions)
• Next by Date: RE: XQuery Primer in HTML
• Previous by thread: RE: Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: the web client interface was RE: Two link questions)
• Next by thread: RE: Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: the web client interface was RE: Two link questions)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread