• To: "xml-dev@l..." <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: namespaces (was RE: rss regularis(z)ation)
• From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 09:27:38 -0400
• In-reply-to: <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D1173AF3@R...>
• References: <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D1173AF3@R...>
• User-agent: Opera7.03/Win32 M2 build 2670

> Debating the pros and cons of XML namespaces is like arguing about 
> whether the internal combustion engine is a good idea. The world has 
> moved on.


Oooh!  Oooh!  Great analogy, if we're talking about ideas that look great 
at first but uhh, have a lot of toxic side effects <duck>

Sorry ... couldn't resist ... but wondering what the XML equivalent of 
global warming is ....

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: namespaces (was RE: rss regularis(z)ation)
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>
  • Re: namespaces (was RE: rss regularis(z)ation)
    • From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@b...>

• References:
  • RE: namespaces (was RE: rss regularis(z)ation)
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: namespaces (was RE: rss regularis(z)ation)
• Next by Date: Re: namespaces (was RE: rss regularis(z)ation)
• Previous by thread: Re: namespaces (was RE: rss regularis(z)ation)
• Next by thread: Re: namespaces (was RE: rss regularis(z)ation)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread