• To: dareo@m...
• Subject: Re: namespaces (was RE: rss regularis(z)ation)
• From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
• Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 14:25:26 +0100
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D1173AF3@R...>(dareo@m...)
• References: <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D1173AF3@R...>

> Debating the pros and cons of XML namespaces is like arguing about
> whether the internal combustion engine is a good idea. The world has
> moved on.  

Of course it would be helpful if common XML parsers implemented them as
specified,

<!DOCTYPE a [
<!ELEMENT a EMPTY>
<!ATTLIST a xmlns  CDATA "http://www.example.com" >
]>
<a/>

the above is a well formed, valid and namespace conforming document I
believe, msxml3/IE says:

Use of default namespace declaration attribute in DTD not
supported. Error processing resource 'file:///C:/tmp/ns.xml'. Line 5,
Position 5


David


 

________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________

• References:
  • RE: namespaces (was RE: rss regularis(z)ation)
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: namespaces (was RE: rss regularis(z)ation)
• Next by Date: Re: namespaces (was RE: rss regularis(z)ation)
• Previous by thread: RE: namespaces (was RE: rss regularis(z)ation)
• Next by thread: Re: namespaces (was RE: rss regularis(z)ation)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread