[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
At 12:21 17/07/2003 -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote: > Well, that part of our infrastructure is an abomination IMHO. >Sorry my code will fail on > file://c:/sgml/uriincl/uriIncl.xml >because from the small semantic I can extract from RFC 2396, it's >a file scheme with a c:/ authority, and to me C: is neither >a server nor a registered component. +1, even I could see that. Is microsoft wrong!!!! > The only definition I found of the file scheme is RFC 1738 > http://www.w3.org/Addressing/rfc1738.txt >which obviously shows its age (and is obsoleted by 2396 except 2396 >does not define specific scheme). 1738 states Perhaps TAG could take this one up... since the ietf appears content to let it rot? regards DaveP
|

Cart



