• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: XSLT vs. CSS (Re: Indexing)
• From: Dave Pawson <dpawson@n...>
• Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2003 17:13:47 +0100
• In-reply-to: <5.2.0.9.2.20030708171504.02495b78@s...>
• References: <33856.65.121.82.178.1057698382.squirrel@c... .com><5.2.0.9.2.20030708165304.00ad2d00@s...><5.2.0.9.2.20030708100540.023f4640@s...><000b01c34555$a9074af0$6401a8c0@tbp1><Pine.LNX.4.44.0307082054410.16181-100000@l...><5.2.0.9.2.20030708165304.00ad2d00@s...>

At 17:18 08/07/2003 -0400, Simon St.Laurent wrote:


>  I also find XSLT to have been a convenient excuse for certain vendors to 
> ignore improving the level of support of CSS in their browsers and in 
> their other tools.

I don't see the logic there Simon.
Would you expand please?

Regards DaveP 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XSLT vs. CSS (Re: Indexing)
    • From: Frank <frank@b...>
  • Re: XSLT vs. CSS (Re: Indexing)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • Re: XSLT vs. CSS (Re: Indexing)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: XSLT vs. CSS (Re: Indexing)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: XSLT vs. CSS (Re: Indexing)
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
  • Re: XSLT vs. CSS (Re: Indexing)
    • From: Michael Day <mikeday@y...>
  • Re: XSLT vs. CSS (Re: Indexing)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XSLT vs. CSS (Re: Indexing)
• Next by Date: Re: Motivations for namespaces (sorry)
• Previous by thread: RE: XSLT vs. CSS (Re: Indexing)
• Next by thread: Re: XSLT vs. CSS (Re: Indexing)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread