Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
An excellent example. Thanks Frank! Microsofties listen up: the market will begin to notice that IE isn't keeping up with its competitors, and market share will begin to slip because regardless of what one knows about architecture, the perception of the web is still that it is browsable. Risk! Other browser vendors, note: Microsoft isn't keeping up. Opportunity! Authors take note: a better looking page is a better looking page and a cheaper better looking page is a profitable page. Opportunity! So glad not to be in the browser business where I was six years ago. len From: Frank [mailto:frank@b...] On Wed, 2003-07-09 at 10:26, Mike Kozlowski wrote: > My point was, and is, simply that XSLT and CSS are solving different > problems entirely, and don't directly compete in any way. Is that a > statement with which you can agree? How about _should_ solve different problems. I hesitate to speak for Simon, let alone web developers that I really don't know, but I find it an expensive pain in the rear to have another step in my pipeline doing <xsl:template match='section'> <h2>SECTION <xsl:value-of select="position()"/> ... merely because section:before { content: "SECTION " counter(secnum) " " ; } doesn't work -- Frank <frank@t...> ----------------------------------------------------------------- The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
|
