• To: Norman Walsh <ndw@n...>,xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: DTDs: Teilite vs. Sdocbook
• From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
• Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 17:35:42 -0400
• In-reply-to: <87brva5sju.fsf@n...>
• References: <6.0.0.12.0.20030731162143.051223c8@n...><6.0.0.12.0.20030730092327.04a51e78@i...><6.0.0.12.0.20030731162143.051223c8@n...>

At 04:51 PM 7/31/2003, Norman Walsh wrote:

>Who's elements ya callin' irrelevant, pal? :-)

I agree. All elements are relevant. Let's automatically generate a DTD that 
encompasses the Cartesian Cross-product of the XHTML 1.0, TEI, and DocBook 
DTDs.

Jonathan
(who has been muttering a lot about "undesirable elements" lately....) 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: DTDs: Teilite vs. Sdocbook
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>

• References:
  • Re: DTDs: Teilite vs. Sdocbook
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
  • DTDs: Teilite vs. Sdocbook
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
  • Re: DTDs: Teilite vs. Sdocbook
    • From: Norman Walsh <ndw@n...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?
• Next by Date: Re: more politics
• Previous by thread: Re: DTDs: Teilite vs. Sdocbook
• Next by thread: Re: DTDs: Teilite vs. Sdocbook
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread