• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: DTDs: Teilite vs. Sdocbook
• From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
• Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 20:35:51 -0400
• References: <6.0.0.12.0.20030731162143.051223c8@n...> <6.0.0.12.0.20030730092327.04a51e78@i...> <6.0.0.12.0.20030731162143.051223c8@n...> <6.0.0.12.0.20030731173408.032c1f30@n...>

[Jonathan Robie]
> At 04:51 PM 7/31/2003, Norman Walsh wrote:
>
> >Who's elements ya callin' irrelevant, pal? :-)
>
> I agree. All elements are relevant. Let's automatically generate a DTD
that
> encompasses the Cartesian Cross-product of the XHTML 1.0, TEI, and DocBook
> DTDs.
>

Good, and the next move will be to subset it, neatly tying up one of the the
other major threads tonight.

Cheers,

Tom P

• References:
  • Re: DTDs: Teilite vs. Sdocbook
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
  • DTDs: Teilite vs. Sdocbook
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
  • Re: DTDs: Teilite vs. Sdocbook
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: reaching humans (was Re: Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?)
• Next by Date: Re: more politics
• Previous by thread: Re: DTDs: Teilite vs. Sdocbook
• Next by thread: Resolution to OWLish question?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread