Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Seairth Jacobs wrote: > No, in this case, I am saying the primary vocabulary *never* uses > namespaces, regardless of whether there are secondary vocabularies or not. > This would mean that no change in code would be required to handle the > primary vocabulary. Only as long as the primary vocabulary is never embedded in another vocabulary or any enveloping document with a default namespace. > I agree that the "sometimes" approach is not good. But > I do not see a need to namespace the primary vocabulary under any > circumstances. To enforce your rules, you need another rule - primary vocabularies can never be embedded, even in other primary vocabularies. But to paraphrase Meyer, real vocabularies have no top. Bill de hÓra
|
