• To: Dare Obasanjo <dareo@m...>
• Subject: RE: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
• From: Murali Mani <mani@C...>
• Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 13:14:37 -0700 (PDT)
• Cc: Bob Foster <bob@o...>, <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <B885BEDCB3664E4AB1C72F1D85CB29F806484486@R...>

Thanks for the clarification, these are the things I was hoping someone
could tell me, using for iterator etc, have we introduced more non-closed
operators?? Has someone looked at them closely..?? I suspect there will be
some more operators of this nature in XPath 2.0..

thanks and regards - murali.

On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, Dare Obasanjo wrote:

> There isn't element construction in any version of XPath I've seen.
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: Murali Mani [mailto:mani@C...]
> Sent: Thu 6/12/2003 12:57 PM
> To: Bob Foster
> Cc: xml-dev@l...
> Subject: Re:  xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
>
>
>
> At the same time, I can also argue that if we do not allow | or element
> construction the result will be regular, right? But this cannot be
> solution also - because we need | operator.. but do we need element
> construction in XPath??
>
> thanks and regards - murali.
>
>

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>

• References:
  • RE: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
• Next by Date: Re: More on namespaces...
• Previous by thread: RE: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
• Next by thread: RE: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread