Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
"Derek Denny-Brown" <derekdb@m...> writes: > Adding no-public-benchmark clauses to the EULA is something largely > beyond the control of the Msxml team. No-one was blaming the MSXML team, but it's interesting that you should jump in to defend the bad cops. > Anything else > requires jumps through flaming hoops of legalese. The clause is there > to avoid the classic problem of people disregarding all published > best-practices, and write a test which shows that the product is X times > slower than some other product, i.e. it helps protect against overly > contrived benchmarks. You mean contrived benchmarks like the Microsoft report on Java Pet Store last year? Ari.
|
