• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
• From: ari@c... (K. Ari Krupnikov)
• Date: 11 Jun 2003 23:56:46 -0700
• In-reply-to: <001e01c33067$3e825740$6401a8c0@pcukmka>
• References: <001e01c33067$3e825740$6401a8c0@pcukmka>
• Sender: ari@l...
• User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2

"Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...> writes:

> I haven't yet decided how to tackle this problem in doing an XSLT 2.0
> Programmer's Reference. It will almost certainly have to be less
> comprehensive than the 1.0 version, or no-one will buy it.

You don't expect people to buy the book of that complexity/size but
you expected them to buy the underlying spec?

Ari.

• References:
  • RE: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>

• Prev by Date: RE: CSS syntax for RDF
• Next by Date: Re: Benchmarking forbidden?
• Previous by thread: RE: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
• Next by thread: Re: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread