• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Doc vs. Data
• From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
• Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2003 22:30:17 +0200
• In-reply-to: <B885BEDCB3664E4AB1C72F1D85CB29F806484454@R...>
• Organization: Dyomedea (http://dyomedea.com)
• References: <B885BEDCB3664E4AB1C72F1D85CB29F806484454@R...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3.1) Gecko/20030527 Debian/1.3.1-2

Dare Obasanjo wrote:
>  
> However it is true that XPath is now strongly typed and no longer weakly typed which is probably a rude shock for users of XPath/XSLT 1.0
> 
IMO, the rude shock is that XPath 2.0 has kept the name XPath giving the 
false impression that XPath/XSLT 1.0 users would need to migrate from 
one to the other!

To me they are different languages and there is no special reason to 
move to XPath 2.0 (unless of course you really need its features).

Eric
-- 
Lisez-moi sur XMLfr.
                        http://xmlfr.org/index/person/eric+van+der+vlist/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Upcoming Schema languages tutorial (registration open):
  - July 7th   (Portland, OR)      http://makeashorterlink.com/?K27A527A4
  - August 4th (Montreal, Canada)  http://makeashorterlink.com/?U28A217A4
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist       http://xmlfr.org            http://dyomedea.com
(W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema
------------------------------------------------------------------------

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Doc vs. Data
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>

• References:
  • RE: Doc vs. Data
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Documents, data and markup: YAML Ain't Markup Language
• Next by Date: Re: Doc vs. Data
• Previous by thread: RE: Doc vs. Data
• Next by thread: RE: Doc vs. Data
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread