• To: "'Eric van der Vlist'" <vdv@d...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Doc vs. Data
• From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>
• Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2003 23:44:25 +0100
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <3EE0F9D9.1010208@d...>
• Reply-to: <michael.h.kay@n...>

> To me they are different languages and there is no special reason to 
> move to XPath 2.0 (unless of course you really need its features).

There are only ever two possible reasons to move from XXX 1.0 to XXX
2.0: either you need the new features of the new version, or you are
obliged to move forwards because everyone else is doing so. This applies
to XPath as much as to any other XXX, so it's not clear what point you
are making.

Michael Kay

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Doc vs. Data
    • From: ari@c... (K. Ari Krupnikov)
  • Re: Doc vs. Data
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>

• References:
  • Re: Doc vs. Data
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>

• Prev by Date: RE: YAML Ain't Markup Language
• Next by Date: Re: ANN: XUL Alliance Goes Live - New XML UI Standards Body Emerging?
• Previous by thread: Re: Doc vs. Data
• Next by thread: Re: Doc vs. Data
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread