• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
• From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>
• Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 19:17:37 -0700
• In-reply-to: <5.2.0.9.2.20030619171801.00aed158@p...>
• References: <5.2.0.9.2.20030619171801.00aed158@p...> <200306172155.h5HLth113469@d...>

Dave Pawson wrote:
>
> At 03:29 18/06/2003 -0700, Mike Fitzgerald wrote:
>
> >Don't know, but I'd be interested to know. Who out there is using
> >minOccurs/maxOccurs in XML Schema beyond zero-one-many? Can you live without
> >minOccurs/maxOccurs or do you gotta have it?
>
> http://www.loc.gov/nls/z3986/v100/
>
> DAISY talking book.
> Ripping off html, we used about 8 mandatory and a few optional
> meta elements.
> Seems a valid use case to me.
> Currently validating using XSLT.


Forgive me for being dense, but where in the vocabulary
definition do you use cardinality constraints other than
OPT, REP, and PLUS?  I don't spot any in the formal or
informal parts of the DTDs.


--Joe English

  jenglish@f...

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
    • From: Dave Pawson <dpawson@n...>

• References:
  • RE: modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
    • From: Dave Pawson <dpawson@n...>
  • Re: modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
    • From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Create XML
• Next by Date: Re: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
• Previous by thread: Re: modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
• Next by thread: Re: modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread