• To: "Mike Fitzgerald" <mike@w...>,"Joe English" <jenglish@f...>, <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
• From: Dave Pawson <dpawson@n...>
• Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 17:19:42 +0100
• In-reply-to: <AOEKKCOOGNDOAHCLNEIFAENPDOAA.mike@w...>
• References: <200306172155.h5HLth113469@d...>

At 03:29 18/06/2003 -0700, Mike Fitzgerald wrote:

>Don't know, but I'd be interested to know. Who out there is using
>minOccurs/maxOccurs in XML Schema beyond zero-one-many? Can you live without
>minOccurs/maxOccurs or do you gotta have it?


http://www.loc.gov/nls/z3986/v100/

DAISY talking book.
Ripping off html, we used about 8 mandatory and a few optional
meta elements.

Seems a valid use case to me.
Currently validating using XSLT.

regards DaveP

• References:
  • Re: modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
    • From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>
  • RE: modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
    • From: "Mike Fitzgerald" <mike@w...>

• Prev by Date: Re: modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
• Next by Date: RE: ANN: Namespace Routing Language
• Previous by thread: RE: modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
• Next by thread: Re: modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread