• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: XML Catalogs finished?
• From: "Lauren Wood" <lauren@t...>
• Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2003 09:05:33 -0700
• In-reply-to: <20030604112307.GE21985@c...>
• Organization: Textuality
• Priority: normal
• References: <3.0.6.32.20030604131640.00986008@m...>
• Reply-to: lauren@t...

On 4 Jun 2003 John Cowan wrote:

> Gustaf Liljegren scripsit:
> > I'm not familiar with OASIS' decision process, but this document looks
> > finished:
> > 
> > http://makeashorterlink.com/?Y2E825DC4
> 
> It's a stable document, representing the consensus of the committee.
> To move it along to an OASIS standard, three OASIS members have to
> certify that they are using it, and then a vote is held wherein
> at least 10% of the membership must vote yes and no more than 10% may
> vote no.

The document has a few editorial changes to the previous version of 
the Committee Specification. The Entity Resolution TC is doing an 
internal review for two weeks, then we'll start the formal process of 
applying for OASIS Standard (which includes a public review). 
Comments are welcome at entity-resolution-comment@l...-
open.org. 

Basically, as John said, the TC thinks it's finished but the OASIS 
membership hasn't had a chance yet to say whether they think it is 
worth calling an OASIS standard.

cheers,

Lauren

-- 

Lauren Wood, Chair, OASIS EntityResolution TC

• References:
  • XML Catalogs finished?
    • From: Gustaf Liljegren <gustaf.liljegren@x...>
  • Re: XML Catalogs finished?
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: W3C Voting (Was: XML Catalogs finished?)
• Next by Date: Re: W3C Voting (Was: XML Catalogs finished?)
• Previous by thread: Re: XML Catalogs finished?
• Next by thread: Re: XML Catalogs finished?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread