• To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Subject: Re: XUL Standardization: Lessons from the RSS Civil War
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 15:09:19 -0400
• Cc: "'Tim Bray'" <tbray@t...>, "'danny666@v...'" <danny666@v...>, xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE022DC4CA@h...>
• References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE022DC4CA@h...>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

Bullard, Claude L (Len) scripsit:

> Umm... isn't that pretty much what the SGML ERB did?
> Many could propose but only the self-selected group 
> could dispose and decide.  ISO had the copyrights for 
> ISO 8879, but XML was created as a subset and the 
> normative reference maintained.  

Umm, what normative reference?  XML 1.0 has an *informative*
reference to ISO 8879.  The normative references are about URIs,
language tags, and Unicode.

-- 
John Cowan  www.ccil.org/~cowan  www.reutershealth.com  jcowan@r...
All "isms" should be "wasms".   --Abbie

• References:
  • RE: XUL Standardization: Lessons from the RSS Civil War
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XML-based Automation (Was: Zen or Games?)
• Next by Date: Lessons from the RSS Civil War: The Circle Of Life
• Previous by thread: RE: XUL Standardization: Lessons from the RSS Civil War
• Next by thread: RE: XUL Standardization: Lessons from the RSS Civil War
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread