• To: ari@c... (K. Ari Krupnikov), xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Doc vs. Data
• From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2003 13:56:11 -0400
• In-reply-to: <m3n0grno1f.fsf@t...>
• References: <01dc01c32d46$589a8c70$6401a8c0@pcukmka><m3n0grno1f.fsf@t...>

At 10:44 AM -0700 6/9/03, K. Ari Krupnikov wrote:

>Just as long as "everyone else" doesn't include the maintainer of the
>XXX 1.0 processor you use.

Are any of the open source XSLT processors clean enough to be 
plausibly forked? The only one I've spent any time exploring (Saxon) 
gave me shivers, it was so convoluted.
-- 

   Elliotte Rusty Harold
   elharo@m...
   Processing XML with Java (Addison-Wesley, 2002)
   http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xmljava
   http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0201771861/cafeaulaitA

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Doc vs. Data
    • From: ari@c... (K. Ari Krupnikov)

• References:
  • RE: Doc vs. Data
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>
  • Re: Doc vs. Data
    • From: ari@c... (K. Ari Krupnikov)

• Prev by Date: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
• Next by Date: Re: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
• Previous by thread: Re: Doc vs. Data
• Next by thread: Re: Doc vs. Data
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread