• To: "'Erik Bruchez'" <erik@b...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
• From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>
• Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 12:17:15 +0100
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <3EF2267F.8050206@b...>
• Reply-to: <michael.h.kay@n...>

> Maybe W3C should require the development of a reference 
> implementation for every spec. This is the way Sun's Java 
> Community Process works.

W3C arguably goes beyond this: it requires multiple implementations of a
specification before the spec goes from Candidate Rec to Rec status.

Michael Kay

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
    • From: James Clark <jjc@j...>
  • RE: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • Re: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
    • From: Erik Bruchez <erik@b...>

• Prev by Date: RE: The burning XML-DEV question of Where is Australia? (was Re: ANN: Namespace Routing Language)
• Next by Date: RE: DTD Definition
• Previous by thread: Re: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
• Next by thread: RE: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread