• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
• From: James Clark <jjc@j...>
• Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2003 06:34:19 +0700
• In-reply-to: <002601c3371d$814778f0$6401a8c0@pcukmka>
• References: <002601c3371d$814778f0$6401a8c0@pcukmka>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20030225

Michael Kay wrote:

> W3C arguably goes beyond this: it requires multiple implementations of a
> specification before the spec goes from Candidate Rec to Rec status.

To be more precise, I believe what it requires is multiple 
implementations _of each feature_ of a spec.  This is rather different 
from requiring multiple complete implementations of a spec.

James

• References:
  • RE: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Create XML
• Next by Date: Re: The burning XML-DEV question of Where is Australia?(was Re: ANN: Namespace Routing Language)
• Previous by thread: RE: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
• Next by thread: Re: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread