• To: Dennis Sosnoski <dms@s...>
• Subject: Re: YAML Ain't Markup Language
• From: Frank <frank@b...>
• Date: 06 Jun 2003 16:21:31 -0400
• Cc: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>, xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <3EE0F1E8.4050003@s...>
• Organization:
• References: <B885BEDCB3664E4AB1C72F1D85CB29F80648444F@R...> <B885BEDCB3664E4AB1C72F1D85CB29F80648444F@R...> <5.2.0.9.0.20030606145016.075bebc8@n...> <3EE0F1E8.4050003@s...>

On Fri, 2003-06-06 at 15:56, Dennis Sosnoski wrote:
> Jonathan Robie wrote:
> 

> >
> >As opposed to the TEI crowd, who were intent on the use of XML documents to 
> >represent literature used in the humanities....
> >

I believe that's really "literature _studied_ in the humanities". That's a very pointy corner
case: for literary and linguistic scholars documents ARE data, in a way that
eg the SQL Server manual isn't to Dare. So I find it unsurprising that that application
could make good use of data-oriented tools.

Frank

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: YAML Ain't Markup Language
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>

• References:
  • RE: YAML Ain't Markup Language
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
  • Re: YAML Ain't Markup Language
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
  • Re: YAML Ain't Markup Language
    • From: Dennis Sosnoski <dms@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Re: YAML Ain't Markup Language
• Next by Date: Documents, data and markup: YAML Ain't Markup Language
• Previous by thread: Re: YAML Ain't Markup Language
• Next by thread: Re: YAML Ain't Markup Language
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread