• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Subject: Re: XML 1.1 and Unicode normalization
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 18:20:30 -0400
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <r01050400-1026-0CBAB3D7975811D7B5F00003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>
• References: <20030604112718.GG21985@c...> <r01050400-1026-0CBAB3D7975811D7B5F00003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

Simon St.Laurent scripsit:

> While I support what XML 1.1 is trying to do, I have a really hard time
> seeing anything "now or never" about it.  If there's no great rush to
> implement, I'm not sure why there's a great rush to standardize.  James'
> experience hardly seems unusual.

I'm somewhat bound by confidentiality here, but it's my personal belief that
if we don't see implementations of normalization-checking fairly soon, the
WG might well decide to delete mention of checking from XML 1.1.

-- 
But that, he realized, was a foolish            John Cowan
thought; as no one knew better than he          jcowan@r...
that the Wall had no other side.                http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
        --Arthur C. Clarke, "The Wall of Darkness"

• References:
  • Re: XML 1.1 and Unicode normalization
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
  • Re: XML 1.1 and Unicode normalization
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: W3C Voting (Was: XML Catalogs finished?)
• Next by Date: Re: Unicode normalization tools
• Previous by thread: Re: XML 1.1 and Unicode normalization
• Next by thread: RE: XML 1.1 and Unicode normalization
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread