• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: XML 1.1 and Unicode normalization
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 09:17:25 -0400
• In-reply-to: <20030604112718.GG21985@c...>

James Anderson wrote:
>while the referenced specification requires that all "producers of
>strings" ensure (not just check) that they are normalized, led this
>implementer to put the proposals back, to wait for later versions.

John Cowan replies (without quoted context about waiting):
>As for waiting, it's now or never as far as XML 1.1 is concerned.

John, could you clarify what this "now or never" is about?  

While I support what XML 1.1 is trying to do, I have a really hard time
seeing anything "now or never" about it.  If there's no great rush to
implement, I'm not sure why there's a great rush to standardize.  James'
experience hardly seems unusual.






-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML 1.1 and Unicode normalization
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
  • Re: XML 1.1 and Unicode normalization
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>

• References:
  • Re: XML 1.1 and Unicode normalization
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML 1.1 and Unicode normalization
• Next by Date: Re: XML 1.1 and Unicode normalization
• Previous by thread: Re: XML 1.1 and Unicode normalization
• Next by thread: Re: XML 1.1 and Unicode normalization
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread