• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: W3C Voting (Was: XML Catalogs finished?)
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 13:08:03 -0400
• In-reply-to: <5.2.0.9.0.20030604130214.03608ff8@n...>

jonathan.robie@d... (Jonathan Robie) writes:
>Perhaps someone has a better memory than I do - I believe that the
>initial RDF Schema was rejected because of the AC review. Is this
>right? Were there others?
>
>I can research this if nobody knows...

It would be nice to know about specific cases, but more general openness
and accountability (beyond the membership) would be a lot better.  Given
the odds of the latter, I'll certainly take the former.

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org

• References:
  • Re: W3C Voting (Was: XML Catalogs finished?)
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: W3C Voting (Was: XML Catalogs finished?)
• Next by Date: Re: W3C Voting (Was: XML Catalogs finished?)
• Previous by thread: Re: W3C Voting (Was: XML Catalogs finished?)
• Next by thread: Re: W3C Voting (Was: XML Catalogs finished?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread