• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>,xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: W3C Voting (Was: XML Catalogs finished?)
• From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
• Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2003 13:03:22 -0400
• In-reply-to: <r01050400-1026-C19A43D896AC11D7B5F00003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>
• References: <3EDE2253.60403@e...>

At 12:51 PM 6/4/2003 -0400, Simon St.Laurent wrote:

>robin.berjon@e... (Robin Berjon) writes:
> >I wouldn't think so. The way I understand the process, if a number of
> >AC reps clamour vigorously against a spec, something will come of it.
> >You don't need a majority.
>
>It would, of course, be nice to know that.  Since we can't know that,
>we're just stuck in the usual Kremlinology and prayer.

Perhaps someone has a better memory than I do - I believe that the initial 
RDF Schema was rejected because of the AC review. Is this right? Were there 
others?

I can research this if nobody knows...

Jonathan 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: W3C Voting (Was: XML Catalogs finished?)
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
  • Re: W3C Voting (Was: XML Catalogs finished?)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • Re: W3C Voting (Was: XML Catalogs finished?)
    • From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
  • Re: W3C Voting (Was: XML Catalogs finished?)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: W3C Voting (Was: XML Catalogs finished?)
• Next by Date: Re: W3C Voting (Was: XML Catalogs finished?)
• Previous by thread: Re: W3C Voting (Was: XML Catalogs finished?)
• Next by thread: Re: W3C Voting (Was: XML Catalogs finished?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread