• To: Jeni Tennison <jeni@j...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
• From: Dave Pawson <dpawson@n...>
• Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 17:18:05 +0100
• In-reply-to: <134251175321.20030617155606@j...>
• References: <3EE624E1.5080100@d...><5.2.0.9.0.20030610135301.0527ddd8@n...><3EE611ED.1010200@b...><3EE4D7B1.85D735A9@m...><5.2.0.9.2.20030610170510.00af5aa0@p...><3EE611ED.1010200@b...><5.2.0.9.0.20030610135301.0527ddd8@n...><5.2.0.9.0.20030610141243.0527ddd8@n...><3EE624E1.5080100@d...>

At 15:56 17/06/2003 +0100, Jeni Tennison wrote:

>I'll be expanding on these observations in my talk at Extreme Markup
>Languages 2003 in Montreal this August, which is specifically about
>the hoops XSLT authors have to jump through when using a Basic XSLT
>2.0 processor (i.e. one that doesn't support the typing of nodes) due
>to strong typing in XPath 2.0.

I hope you'll post the slides after the talk Jeni.

regards DaveP

• References:
  • Re: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
  • Re: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
  • Re: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
    • From: Erik Bruchez <erik@b...>
  • xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
    • From: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@m...>
  • RE: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
    • From: Dave Pawson <dpawson@n...>
  • Re: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
  • Re: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
    • From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@j...>

• Prev by Date: Re: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
• Next by Date: Re: More on namespaces...
• Previous by thread: Re: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
• Next by thread: Re: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread