• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
• From: Dave Pawson <dpawson@n...>
• Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 17:06:54 +0100
• In-reply-to: <001701c32ec9$58589390$6401a8c0@pcukmka>
• References: <3EE4D7B1.85D735A9@m...>

At 21:54 09/06/2003 +0100, Michael Kay wrote:


>And your conclusion is?
>
>I think that if you actually measure the size of the languages by number
>of productions, operators, elements, attributes, etc, then you find
>XPath has grown by about 70% and XSLT by around 40% - which is an annual
>growth rate of about 10-15%. The rest of the growth in the document
>sizes represents more thorough specification of each language feature.

I wonder what the reaction will be when the server side users start
to experiment?

A quick laugh, then back to 1.0?

regards DaveP

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
    • From: Erik Bruchez <erik@b...>
  • Re: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
    • From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>

• References:
  • xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
    • From: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@m...>
  • RE: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>

• Prev by Date: Re: generating a doc out of a xml schema
• Next by Date: Re: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
• Previous by thread: Re: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
• Next by thread: Re: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread