• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: Following up ... a "Living without W3C Namespaces" manifesto?
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 14:45:54 -0400
• In-reply-to: <5.1.0.14.0.20030604185407.01c48ea0@m...>

sean.mcgrath@p... (Sean McGrath) writes:
>What does the word "local" mean?

Whatever it means sort of vaguely near you. ;-)

>We need a way of handling the problems that avoids artificial and
>ephemeral context boundaries such as local and non-local.

I tend to use "local" to avoid people forcing "artificial and ephemeral
context boundaries" into my work, but maybe there's a better way of
expressing this, since local/non-local isn't a clear boundary on the
best of days.

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org

• References:
  • RE: Following up ... a "Living without W3C Namespaces" manifesto?
    • From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Following up ... a "Living without W3C Namespaces" manifesto?
• Next by Date: RDDL resurfaces
• Previous by thread: RE: Following up ... a "Living without W3C Namespaces" manifesto?
• Next by thread: W3C Voting (Was: XML Catalogs finished?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread