[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]


John Cowan <cowan@m...> wrote:
| Arjun Ray scripsit:
| 
|> Yup.  It can be as simple as that.  The XSLT case is actually easier than
|> the general problem, because there are no overlaps.  All XSLT needs is the
|> moral equivalent of Lisp's quote/backquote operator.  
| 
| Pooh.  That only works because ` (in Lisp) or ` and UNQUOTE (in Scheme)
| are reserved names. 

I didn't merely say "operator".  I said "moral equivalent".

| XSLT has no reserved names, not even its own. It merely requires that not 
| *every* possible name be used.

A control attribute is all the moral equivalent needed.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member