[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]


Does anyone have an example of a collision that can only be solved, 
or even best be solved with XML Namespaces? A neccessary condition 
is ideal, but examples where namespace represents an optimal design 
decision will do. I'm asking for two reasons:

  - in my work with XML I've never run across a collision problem 
that seemed to require namespaces. I wondering whether they're rare 
or whether the markup I dela with is unusual.

  - I'm looking for markup that I can use for test cases and 
thinking about the matter.

I went looking in the Namepsaces spec and found this example and an 
assertion:

[[[
<section><title>Book-Signing Event</title>
<signing>
   <author title="Mr" name="Vikram Seth" />
   <book title="A Suitable Boy" price="$22.95" /></signing>
<signing>
   <author title="Dr" name="Oliver Sacks" />
   <book title="The Island of the Color-Blind" price="$12.95" 
/></signing>
</section>

In this example, there are three occurrences of the name title 
within markup, and the name alone clearly provides insufficient 
information to allow correct processing by a software module
]]]

It demonstrates no such thing to me. For example, here is the 
sufficient information:

  /section/title
  /section/signing/author@title
  /section/signing/book@title

I suspect this particular assertion about the insufficiency of 
traditional namespaces in the spec is false. I believe for it to be 
true, there would need to exist markup for which no keys could be 
computed to dilineate one element or attribute from another.

Bill de hÓra


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member