• To: "Michael Rys" <mrys@m...>, <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Ten new XQuery, XSLT 2.0 and XPath 2.0 Working
• From: Dave Pawson <dpawson@n...>
• Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 18:54:44 +0100
• In-reply-to: <5C39F806F9939046B4B1AFE652500A3A054670ED@R...>

At 10:44 09/05/2003 -0700, Michael Rys wrote:
>The data model also can be generated from just Infosets. The instances
>will be annotated with xdt:untypedAtomic for attribute values and
>(currently) xs:anyType (soon xdt:untypedAny or similar) for element
>content type.
>
>So if XSD goes down the drain (what does this mean anyway?)

Shrivels and dies through lack of use, or is overtaken by
a schema that works.

>  XSLT and
>XQuery still work on untyped data.

I remain to be convinced. I've only had a few hours with Saxon 7.4.

XSLT is my concern today.
   I've no idea what xquery want..


>And there is no reason why you cannot add your own built-in type names

I really don't want to Michael.
   The xslt+xpath1 'data model' is adequate for me.

regards DaveP

• References:
  • RE: Ten new XQuery, XSLT 2.0 and XPath 2.0 Working
    • From: "Michael Rys" <mrys@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: SALT Transaction Protocol [was: Blended Authentication(AKA "Granular Access Control")]
• Next by Date: RE: Polemicism
• Previous by thread: RE: Ten new XQuery, XSLT 2.0 and XPath 2.0 Working
• Next by thread: RE: Ten new XQuery, XSLT 2.0 and XPath 2.0 Working
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread