• To: "Rich Salz" <rsalz@d...>
• Subject: RE: DIME - Status?
• From: "Don Box" <dbox@m...>
• Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 02:34:39 -0700
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• Thread-index: AcMU6ICzFEpWsXy7TISVjObgMy9C5QAW4quR
• Thread-topic: DIME - Status?

Rich, I think you may have misread my original post.
 
Hopefully, http://www.gotdotnet.com/team/dbox/default.aspx?key=2003-05-08T09:27:27Z should clear things up.
 
Cheers,
DB
 

________________________________

From: Rich Salz [mailto:rsalz@d...]
Sent: Wed 5/7/2003 3:31 PM
To: Chiusano Joseph
Cc: Dare Obasanjo; xml-dev@l...
Subject: Re:  DIME - Status?



> Thanks Dare - this is for an article that I am writing. Unless you reply
> to the contrary, I will consider the current status and future direction
> of DIME and WS-Attachments as "uncertain", and communicate it as such in
> the article.

I'd go further than that.  One of the senior MSFT GXA architects wrote,
on an MSFT-run website, that DIME is to be "avoided," that there are no
plans to ship new implementations.  PASWA -- MIME -- is the way to go.
        /r$



-----------------------------------------------------------------
The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>

The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/

To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>

• Prev by Date: RE: Ten new XQuery, XSLT 2.0 and XPath 2.0 Working
• Next by Date: [ANN] Sarissa 0.9 b released, added XPath support
• Previous by thread: RE: DIME - Status?
• Next by thread: Looking for XML search tool.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread