• To: "'Mike Champion'" <mc@x...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Ten new XQuery, XSLT 2.0 and XPath 2.0 Working
• From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>
• Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 10:04:12 +0100
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <oprotvl2w0ezizxn@s...>
• Reply-to: <michael.h.kay@n...>

> > There are plenty of areas in these specs that would really benefit 
> > from detailed review and feedback, but saying "I think I 
> could design 
> > a better language" is not helpful at this stage.
> 
> Right.  But how about "I don't want to have to deal with all 
> 40-odd XSDL 
> types in my implementation, please change the Basic 
> conformance level"?  

Specific comments such as "I think that an XQuery processor should throw
an error if it encounters an attribute of type xs:NOTATION" are of
course very welcome, if the rationale is given.

Michael Kay

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Ten new XQuery, XSLT 2.0 and XPath 2.0 Working
    • From: "Bob Foster" <bob@o...>

• References:
  • Re: Ten new XQuery, XSLT 2.0 and XPath 2.0 Working
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Some random noise on rational type systems for XML
• Next by Date: RE: DIME - Status?
• Previous by thread: Re: Ten new XQuery, XSLT 2.0 and XPath 2.0 Working
• Next by thread: Re: Ten new XQuery, XSLT 2.0 and XPath 2.0 Working
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread