• To: "Bob Foster" <bob@o...>,<michael.h.kay@n...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Ten new XQuery, XSLT 2.0 and XPath 2.0 Working
• From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
• Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 09:24:41 -0400
• In-reply-to: <243901c3154e$68317550$1401a8c0@snobird>
• References: <000701c31540$cb295640$6401a8c0@pcukmka>

At 05:41 AM 5/8/2003 -0500, Bob Foster wrote:
>From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>
>
> > Specific comments such as "I think that an XQuery processor should throw
> > an error if it encounters an attribute of type xs:NOTATION" are of
> > course very welcome, if the rationale is given.
>
>That seems to illustrate a problem fundamental to the committee design
>process.

[ !!! SNIP !!! ]

Actually, Mike Kay's comment seems to illustrate a virtue of the committee 
process defined in the W3C: we are required to respond to specific 
technical comments made to our comments list. Philosophical discussion of 
committees on the XML-Dev list - well, they are clearly outside of the 
scope of what our Working Groups are responsible for.

Jonathan

• References:
  • RE: Ten new XQuery, XSLT 2.0 and XPath 2.0 Working
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>
  • Re: Ten new XQuery, XSLT 2.0 and XPath 2.0 Working
    • From: "Bob Foster" <bob@o...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Is XML Doomed ...? (Was: Polemicism)
• Next by Date: Re: Ten new XQuery, XSLT 2.0 and XPath 2.0 Working Drafts
• Previous by thread: RE: Ten new XQuery, XSLT 2.0 and XPath 2.0 Working
• Next by thread: Re: Ten new XQuery, XSLT 2.0 and XPath 2.0 Working
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread