• To: "Don Park" <donpark@d...>
• Subject: Re: XML too hard for programmers?
• From: MURATA Makoto <murata@h...>
• Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 02:19:51 +0900
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <000301c2ee17$34b46010$8b01a8c0@rainbow>
• References: <000301c2ee17$34b46010$8b01a8c0@rainbow>

On Wed, 19 Mar 2003 04:58:14 -0800
"Don Park" <donpark@d...> wrote:

> Maybe a Yacc-like tool + RELAX-NG compact syntax could be helpful. - Don

Kohsuke already mentioned RelaxNGCC.  I am aware of three other approaches.

- XDuce, which is ML with XML, patterns, and schemas added.
	http://xduce.sourceforge.net/

- JWIG, which is Java with XML and schemas (DSD schemas) added.
	http://www.brics.dk/JWIG/

- XP++ is also an extension of Java, but is for stream-based processing
	http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com/tech/xmlprocessingplusplus

Programming languages proposed by PLAN-X papers are also interesting.

http://www.research.avayalabs.com/user/wadler/planx/planx-eproceed/proceed.html

-- 
MURATA Makoto <murata@h...>

• References:
  • RE: XML too hard for programmers?
    • From: "Don Park" <donpark@d...>

• Prev by Date: Semantic Web and First Order Logic
• Next by Date: Apache XML Javadoc project
• Previous by thread: Re: XML too hard for programmers?
• Next by thread: RE: XML too hard for programmers?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread