• To: Don Park <donpark@d...>
• Subject: Re: XML too hard for programmers?
• From: Kohsuke Kawaguchi <kk@k...>
• Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 17:05:02 -0800
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <000301c2ee17$34b46010$8b01a8c0@rainbow>
• References: <5.1.0.14.0.20030319105307.023ace48@m...><000301c2ee17$34b46010$8b01a8c0@rainbow>

check out RelaxNGCC (http://relaxngcc.sourceforge.net/)

It's not based on the compact syntax but other than that, it's pretty
much what you described.

regards,
----------------------
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
E-Mail: kk@k...

• References:
  • RE: XML too hard for programmers?
    • From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...>
  • RE: XML too hard for programmers?
    • From: "Don Park" <donpark@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Word XML
• Next by Date: Re: An approach to let XML 2.n resources hold multipleentities
• Previous by thread: RE: XML too hard for programmers?
• Next by thread: Re: XML too hard for programmers?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread