• To: "martin@h..." <martin@h...>
• Subject: Re: Transactional Integrity of Services (SHORT)
• From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2003 20:40:17 -0500 (EST)
• Cc: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>, XML Dev <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0303302001210.30585-100000@f...>

> sort of like ebXML then? or any SOAP implementation with the payload
> separate from the envelope.

ebXML is "just" an application use of SOAP with Attachments -- multipart
MIME where the first part is the SOAP message.  (I put "just" in quotes,
because it does build a somewhat reliable transport on top of that, and
it also has all those "pesky" business rules, a registry, etc.)

Some folks might find the following articles useful; it's a series I wrote
that gives an overview of the three major "payload" protocols:
  [SwA] http://www.xml.com/pub/a/ws/2002/08/28/endpoints.html
  [DIME] http://www.xml.com/pub/a/ws/2002/09/18/ends.html
  [BEEP] http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2002/10/16/ends.html

	/r$

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Transactional Integrity of Services (SHORT)
    • From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@b...>

• References:
  • Re: Transactional Integrity of Services (SHORT)
    • From: <martin@h...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: Transactional Integrity of Services (LONG)
• Next by Date: Article on GXA (Global XML Web Services Architecture)
• Previous by thread: Re: Transactional Integrity of Services (SHORT)
• Next by thread: Re: Transactional Integrity of Services (SHORT)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread