• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Subject: Re: Transactional Integrity of Services (SHORT)
• From: <martin@h...>
• Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2003 20:04:57 +0000 (GMT)
• Cc: XML Dev <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <r01050400-1024-2C4A916062E611D7B1500003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>

On Sun, 30 Mar 2003, Simon St.Laurent wrote:

> BEEP did a much nicer job with this stuff, using XML for both headers
> and (sometimes) content, but keeping them in separate documents.  They
> demonstrated that XML can useful for protocols work but that you don't
> need to confuse XML documents with messages.

sort of like ebXML then? or any SOAP implementation with the payload
separate from the envelope.

/m

Martin Klang
http://www.o-xml.org - the object-oriented XML programming language

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Transactional Integrity of Services (SHORT)
    • From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
  • Re: Transactional Integrity of Services (SHORT)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • Re: Re: Transactional Integrity of Services (LONG)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML Resources & tools for XML database project?
• Next by Date: Re: Transactional Integrity of Services (SHORT)
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: Transactional Integrity of Services (LONG)
• Next by thread: Re: Transactional Integrity of Services (SHORT)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread