• To: Chiusano Joseph <chiusano_joseph@b...>, XML DEV <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Transactional Integrity of Services (SHORT)
• From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...>
• Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 11:21:39 -0500
• Organization: Fiduciary Automation
• References: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0303302034260.18462-100000@s...> <3E885494.8311F44F@b...> <3E88630D.BD6B40C1@f...> <3E886453.C8341F6A@b...>

Chiusano Joseph wrote:

> You make great points regarding semantics. I would recommend that you track the
> progress of DAML-S [1], an emerging DAML+OIL ontology for Semantic Web Services.

Thank you for your kind words. I am tolerably well aware of DAML-S, though I confess
that I am unpersuaded by its premises (and those of its predecessors in the RDF
lineage). I am at the moment at work on a paper entitled !(Semantic|Web|Services)
which I expect to submit for the Extreme Markup conference
http://www.extrememarkup.com/extreme/ Perhaps we might have the opportunity to discuss
these issues further in that forum as well as this one.

Best regards,

Walter Perry

• References:
  • Re: Transactional Integrity of Services (SHORT)
    • From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
  • Re: Transactional Integrity of Services (SHORT)
    • From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@b...>
  • Re: Transactional Integrity of Services (SHORT)
    • From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...>
  • Re: Transactional Integrity of Services (SHORT)
    • From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@b...>

• Prev by Date: If XML is too hard for regular expressions, perhaps he'd be better off with a parser
• Next by Date: RE: If XML is too hard for a programmer, perhaps he'd b e better off as a crossing guard
• Previous by thread: Re: Transactional Integrity of Services (SHORT)
• Next by thread: Re: Re: Transactional Integrity of Services (LONG)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread