• To: "xml-dev" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Water Contract)
• From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 16:06:32 +1100
• References: <1045441502.7668.ezmlm@l...> <1045470470.3e509d06a6f80@w...> <00e701c2d6fd$985e9300$6601a8c0@n...> <094601c2d71a$6e73a770$4bc8a8c0@A...> <004201c2d765$f5405d20$6601a8c0@n...>

So Schematron's

<rule context="tr"><assert test="count(td) &lt;= ../table/@cols"/></rule>

is more complex than Water's

<defclass table cols=rows.<max_length/> rows='from_content' />
<defmethod max_length>
 <maximum rest=rows.<for_each> value.<length/> </> />
</defmethod>
<defclass table cols rows='from_content'
   _precond=<assert> .cols.<more_or_equal rows.<max_length/> </>
/>

?

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Water Contract)
    • From: "Mike Plusch" <mplusch@c...>

• References:
  • Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision)
    • From: Jochen Wiedmann <joe@i...>
  • Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Water Contract)
    • From: "Mike Plusch" <mplusch@c...>
  • Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Water Contract)
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
  • Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Water Contract)
    • From: "Mike Plusch" <mplusch@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
• Next by Date: Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
• Previous by thread: Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Water Contract)
• Next by thread: Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Water Contract)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread