• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
• From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>
• Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 00:02:23 -0500
• In-reply-to: <5.2.0.9.0.20030218172713.02ef7fb0@n...>
• Organization: Red Bridge Interactive, Inc.
• References: <5.2.0.9.0.20030218172713.02ef7fb0@n...>
• User-agent: KMail/1.4.3

On Tuesday 18 February 2003 05:30 pm, Jonathan Robie wrote:
> For publishing, is there a market ready to accept some set of tools that
> vendors could create for them? 

A very good question. I think there are plenty of tools that *publishers* 
will/could and do use. 

As for producers of information, and general EIM, that is an entirely 
different matter.

• References:
  • RE: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
• Next by Date: Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Water Contract)
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
• Next by thread: Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread