Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
State the problem well. Before the work, let's see the requirement. So far what I get from Mike Champion et al is a general fear of the flowers growing in the wild, not a valid requirement or one which first answers the question of whether or not a single subset can be of enough benefit to enough constituents to be worth the work or the risks. If multiple subsets are growing and if they are as in the binaries, adapted to the needs of particular applications, then the idea Henry Thompson proposed of using conformance levels will be the better course. I've seen the statement for why SOAP restricted the application. That's fine. I've seen no evidence that it should be a normative subset. len From: Sean McGrath [mailto:sean.mcgrath@p...] [Wayne Steele] >Let a thousand subsets bloom! They already have, but we don't like to talk about that on xml-dev:-). *They* are watching us you know. Best that we just pretent the problem isn't there. Keep it too ourselves. Dirty linen best not washed in public. Plug'n'play XML interop? Perish the thought! Where is the money in that?
|
