• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: SGML->XML->? (was Re: SML: Second Try)
• From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...>
• Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 10:28:30 +0000

[Wayne Steele]

 >Let a thousand subsets bloom!

They already have, but we don't like to talk about that on xml-dev:-).

*They* are watching us you know.

Best that we just pretent the problem isn't there. Keep it too ourselves. 
Dirty linen best
not washed in public.

Plug'n'play XML interop? Perish the thought! Where is the money in that?

:-|

Sean

• Prev by Date: Re: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative
• Next by Date: Re: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative
• Previous by thread: RE: SGML->XML->? (was Re: SML: Second Try)
• Next by thread: RE: SGML->XML->? (was Re: SML: Second Try)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread