• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
• From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>
• Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 11:23:25 -0500
• In-reply-to: <5.2.0.9.0.20030218101511.065a73c8@n...>
• Organization: Red Bridge Interactive, Inc.
• References: <7c.35a8563b.2b7ff77d@a...> <5.2.0.9.0.20030218073745.06b30650@n...> <5.2.0.9.0.20030218101511.065a73c8@n...>
• User-agent: KMail/1.4.3

On Tuesday 18 February 2003 10:17 am, Jonathan Robie wrote:
> So what software do publishers need for data capture that isn't getting
> written? 

Data capture is one small part. Having Office support XML etc. will simplify 
the effort of converting the data into what I *really* want (so to answer 
Len's question, XML is *not* important to Office itself, it just makes it a 
bit easier to work with the data). The real work happens after that... and 
banging stuff into a database may or may not help.

• References:
  • Re: Remembering the original XML vision
    • From: AndrewWatt2000@a...
  • Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
  • Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Remembering the original XML vision
• Next by Date: RE: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
• Next by thread: Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread