• Subject: Re: patent application (MSFT)
• From: "Bill Kearney" <wkearney@i...>
• Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 11:36:11 -0500
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• References: <r01050400-1023-CC41F9E33DD011D7BB6D0003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]> <3E4924F4.7030105@n...>
• Reply-to: "Bill Kearney" <wkearney@i...>

My first thought was this is a good way to keep the anti-MS developers busy
whinging about patents instead of writing code.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mitch Amiano" <mamiano@n...>


> My first thought on reviewing the patent was that Microsoft was patenting
Java.
>
> Simon St.Laurent wrote:
> > Perhaps this is an unfortunate fifth birthday present for XML:
> >
> > http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=
> > PG01&p=1&u=/netahtml/PTO/srchnum.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1='20030028685'.PGNR
> > ..&OS=DN/20030028685&RS=DN/20030028685
> >
> > (from news.com: http://news.com.com/2100-1001-984052.html)

• References:
  • patent application (MSFT)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: patent application (MSFT)
    • From: Mitch Amiano <mamiano@n...>

• Prev by Date: Re: patent application (MSFT)
• Next by Date: Re: Please help
• Previous by thread: Re: patent application (MSFT)
• Next by thread: RE: patent application (MSFT)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread