• To: "'mbatsis@n...'" <mbatsis@n...>, XML Dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: patent application (MSFT)
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 09:06:59 -0600

If it covers material affected by those 
implementations, it will depend on the 
licensing terms.  MS could choose to 
grant RF to these implementors.  Let's 
see how this plays out.   The details 
matter.

len

-----Original Message-----
From: m batsis [mailto:mbatsis@n...]

I wonder how this will effect other .NET CLI implementations (Ximian's 
Mono, Corel's Rotor FSF's Portable .NET).

Java, Python and PHP cover all my needs, as I bailed out of MS related 
development some time after .NET came out (JIT;-). However, there are 
some really good things in .NET that could benefit open projects.

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: patent application (MSFT)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: patent application (MSFT)
• Next by Date: RE: patent application (MSFT)
• Previous by thread: patent application (MSFT)
• Next by thread: RE: patent application (MSFT)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread