• To: XML Dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: patent application (MSFT)
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 10:11:30 -0500
• In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EEEACEF3@h...>

clbullar@i... (Bullard, Claude L (Len)) writes:
>If it covers material affected by those 
>implementations, it will depend on the 
>licensing terms.  MS could choose to 
>grant RF to these implementors.  Let's 
>see how this plays out.   The details 
>matter.

This is just an application, not a granted patent. We're a long way from
knowing those details, but there may still be time to keep those details
from coming into existence.

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org

• References:
  • RE: patent application (MSFT)
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: patent application (MSFT)
• Next by Date: Re: patent application (MSFT)
• Previous by thread: RE: patent application (MSFT)
• Next by thread: RE: patent application (MSFT)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread