• To: Jochen Wiedmann <joe@i...>
• Subject: Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision)
• From: Kohsuke Kawaguchi <kohsuke.kawaguchi@s...>
• Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 12:49:19 -0800
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <1045596491.3e52894bc1bd9@w...>
• References: <20030218085530.C212.KOHSUKE.KAWAGUCHI@s...> <1045596491.3e52894bc1bd9@w...>

Sorry, I shouldn't have said "if you don't think XML Schema makes sense".
I meant more like "if you are not satisfied with XML Schema".

The reason I asked that is because I thought you are talking about your
open-source project. I thought open-source programmers are less
concerned about what big vendors are doing. That led me to the question.


> However, fact is, we *have* XML Schema. Vendors are backing
> it (for example, Sun :-) and I suppose they won't be interested
> in moving their tools to Schematron or Relax NG. However,
> a lite version might find agreement.

I'm sure vendors are supporting XML Schema, but that doesn't mean they
are not interested in any others. Indeed I do think they are interested
in other languages.


regards,
----------------------
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
E-Mail: kk@k...

• References:
  • Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XMLvision)
    • From: Kohsuke Kawaguchi <Kohsuke.Kawaguchi@S...>
  • Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision)
    • From: Jochen Wiedmann <joe@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Google as Big Brother
• Next by Date: Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
• Previous by thread: Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision)
• Next by thread: Re: Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread